logo

Global Warming In the News

SearchRSS Feed

Providence Journal - 2005-10-14

Carcieri tightens emission rules

By the end of December, if all goes as planned, Rhode Island will update its vehicle emission standards for the second time in a year.

Governor Carcieri announced yesterday that he will work with the state Department of Environmental Management to adopt the new California greenhouse gas emission standard.

The reasons for the update, Carcieri said, are twofold.

"Fuel efficiency will save Rhode Islanders money at the pump," he said, and "new standards will help ensure healthy residents."

The update will keep state emission standards in line with those of California, the strictest in the country. Eight other states, including Massachusetts, have also adopted the standards.

"This is a big victory," Matt Auten, an advocate with the Rhode Island Public Interest Research Group, said. "It's a big day."

RIPIRG is one of more than 30 organizations that have worked with the DEM and the governor's office on ways to reduce the state's greenhouse emissions since 2002.

Chris Wilhite, an advocate with Clean Water Action, agreed. "It's important that Governor Carcieri has heard this message from a broad coalition and has stood up for the state and to help stop global warming."

Last year, Rhode Island updated its regulations for new vehicles to conform to California's standards. Though the strictest regulations at the time, they did not regulate greenhouse gases, only smog-forming compounds, carbon monoxide and toxic pollutants.

According to Stephen Majkut, chief of air resources at DEM, the new standards will impose progressively stricter limits on the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by new cars sold in-state, in addition to the other pollutants, beginning in 2009.

Greenhouse gases are chemicals that absorb and trap heat in the earth's atmosphere, contributing to localized, as well as global, warming. The new emission standards will work to limit the emission of carbon dioxide, which accounts for 82 percent of man-made greenhouse gases.

To do this, the DEM will impose a "fleet-wide" average emission level that each manufacturer must meet, Majkut said. Some vehicles will be higher emitting than others, but all new cars sold in-state by a particular manufacturer will have to average a certain amount of carbon dioxide per mile driven.

"All of the control is in the manufacturers' hands," W. Michael Sullivan, director of the DEM said, as long as emissions quality is improved.

Across the country, however, auto manufacturers are not pleased with the trend in emission restrictions. Last year, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers filed a lawsuit against the state of California, challenging the new standards.

No one at the manufacturer's alliance was available to comment on the lawsuit.

"Our concerns are the same as manufacturers'," said Jack Perkins at the Rhode Island Automobile Dealers Association, "If you put a burden on them that they cannot meet, what do we wind up having in the state to sell?"

Perkins said there are two reasons auto manufacturers are opposed to the greenhouse gas restrictions: "Auto manufacturers believe that these standards are illegal because it's a way of regulating fuel economy for vehicles, and only the federal government can do that." The other problem, he said, is that the technology is not economically feasible. According to a statement on the manufacturer's alliance Web site, the cost to bring cars into compliance would average $3,000 per vehicle.

Majkut, at the DEM, said some cars on the road already incorporate the technologies that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Turbo-charging an engine, he said, allows for smaller engines to provide more power; cylinder deactivation, which ensures only the necessary cylinders are in use, saves fuel; and multispeed transmission, which shifts gears gradually in automatic transmission cars, is more efficient than traditional transmissions.

With the technology to reach 2009 emission goals, according to Majkut, the increased cost of new-car purchase to the consumer will be about $17. To reach the 2016 goal, that cost would increase to about $1,064. But with gas prices at $3 per gallon, Majkut said, someone who buys a new car can expect to save $245 per year for a five-year period.

The DEM got its estimates from California where, Majkut said, "they have a good record of predicting the cost of their program."

On Oct. 20, there will be a final meeting concerning the new regulations. A public hearing is scheduled Dec. 7 and the adoption of a new rule is set for Dec. 27.

Brandie Jefferson has a fellowship with the Metcalf Institute for Marine and Environmental Reporting. She can be reached at bjeffers@projo.com